Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2009-2013Rutgers
Nick Marsh
PK • 5'11" • Petaluma, CA, USA
Impact contributor
Nick Marsh shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Utah
091011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Utah • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Marsh, PK. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Utah. Nick Marsh shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Nick Marsh played PK for Utah and Rutgers. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nick Marsh recorded 15 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Rutgers.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Utah paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0. Fresno State: 0. Unknown: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Arkansas: 0. SMU: 0. Louisville: 0. Houston: 0. Temple: 0. Cincinnati: 0. UCF: 0. UConn: 0. South Florida: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Notre Dame
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | vs South Florida | W 31-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ UConn | L 17-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/22 | @ UCF | L 17-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Temple | W 23-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Houston | L 14-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/10 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | W 55-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Fresno State | L 51-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah
2009-2012
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2013
Final stop
Season Progression
200920102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
Oregon State
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Pittsburgh
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Arizona State
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Washington
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Utah
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · Utah
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7889
Petaluma · Petaluma, CA
- Committed To
- Utah
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.