Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Southern Miss paired 930 primary output with 68.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Kendrick Hardy College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 2,043
- Rushing yards
- 1,899
- Receiving yards
- 144
- Touchdowns
- 12
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Postseason | Southern Miss | 10 | 67 | 48 | 19 | 0 | 74.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 10 | 863 | 855 | 8 | 7 | 74.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 5 | 472 | 426 | 46 | 2 | 55.9 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 10 | 158 | 151 | 7 | 0 | 27.6 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 10 | 483 | 419 | 64 | 3 | 48.7 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Southern Miss
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
48.3
Efficiency
46
Usage
19.7
Consistency
40.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 29. Nebraska: 35. Arkansas: 29. Boise State: 80. Florida International: 34. Marshall: 14. Louisiana Tech: 9. Florida Atlantic: 33. Middle Tennessee: 83. UAB: 137
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 8 by 37.8. Nebraska: 10 by 36.5. Arkansas: 9 by 33.6. Boise State: 10 by 83.3. Florida International: 12 by 31.2. Marshall: 4 by 36.5. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 46.9. Florida Atlantic: 9 by 38.2. Middle Tennessee: 13 by 56.7. UAB: 22 by 59.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins137 · Games = 1 · +98.6 vs Losses
Losses38.4 · Games = 9 · -98.6 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kendrick Hardy
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.