Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Buffalo
TE • 6'4" • State College, PA, USA
Jake Reeder reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.9
Efficiency
64.4
Consistency
47.3
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Reeder, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Buffalo. Jake Reeder reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jake Reeder played TE for Buffalo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jake Reeder recorded 52 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 52 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
17.3
Efficiency
64.4
Usage
10.9
Consistency
47.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 12. Bowling Green: 32. Northern Illinois: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 2 by 40. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Buffalo | 52 | 64.4 | 10.9 | 52 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | -52 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Buffalo
52 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 10.9 usage
55.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7678
State College Area · State College, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
52
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.