Usage Score
25.2
Player Dossier
2009-2013Buffalo
Alex Neutz
WR • 6'3" • Grand Island, NY, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Alex Neutz reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.3
Consistency
65.9
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Buffalo
091011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Neutz, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Buffalo. Alex Neutz reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 1,015 primary output with 91.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.8
Efficiency
79.3
Usage
25.2
Consistency
65.9
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 77. Ohio State: 98. Baylor: 197. Unknown: 43. UConn: 76. Eastern Michigan: 104. Western Michigan: 9. Massachusetts: 26. Kent State: 75. Ohio: 79. Toledo: 168. Miami (OH): 6. Bowling Green: 66
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 9 by 72.6. Baylor: 6 by 100. Unknown: 10 by 28.7. UConn: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 30. Massachusetts: 2 by 86.7. Kent State: 3 by 100. Ohio: 4 by 100. Toledo: 8 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 40. Bowling Green: 6 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins53.6 · n=7 · -67.6 vs Losses
Losses121.2 · n=5 · +67.6 vs Wins
First Half86.3 · n=7 · +16.3 vs Second Half
Second Half70 · n=6 · -16.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs San Diego State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ San Diego State | L 24-49 | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 1 | 51 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Bowling Green | L 7-24 | — | 6 | 66 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Miami (OH) | W 44-7 | — | 1 | 6 | 2.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-51 | — | 8 | 168 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 47 |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Ohio2+ TD | W 30-3 | — | 4 | 79 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kent State | W 41-21 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 32-3 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Michigan | W 33-0 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | W 42-14 | — | 5 | 104 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UConn | W 41-12 | — | 2 | 76 | 38 | 38 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UnknownHigh volume | — | — | 10 | 43 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor100 receiving yards | L 13-70 | — | 6 | 197 | 32.8 | 32.80 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Ohio StateHigh volume | L 20-40 | — | 9 | 98 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Buffalo | 414 | 86.1 | 18.7 | 414 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 641 | 85 | 23 | 227 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,015 | 91.2 | 38.9 | 374 |
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 1,024 | 79.3 | 25.2 | 9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,024 | 79.3 | 25.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
197
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Buffalo
1,015 primary output · 91.2 efficiency · 38.9 usage
75.9
#2
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
67.5
1,024 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 25.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
67.5
1,024 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 25.2 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7733
Grand Island · Grand Island, NY
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,094
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.