Usage Score
26.6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Buffalo
Fred Lee
WR • 6'2" • Chester, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Fred Lee reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.1
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
68.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Buffalo
091011121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Fred Lee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Buffalo. Fred Lee reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Buffalo paired 692 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
53.2
Efficiency
78.1
Usage
26.6
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 48. Ohio State: 0. Baylor: 29. Unknown: 61. UConn: 51. Eastern Michigan: 33. Western Michigan: 88. Massachusetts: 70. Kent State: 72. Ohio: 19. Toledo: 110. Miami (OH): 61. Bowling Green: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 4 by 80. Baylor: 5 by 38.7. Unknown: 7 by 58.1. UConn: 3 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 8 by 58.3. Kent State: 6 by 80. Ohio: 2 by 63.3. Toledo: 8 by 91.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 5 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins56.3 · n=7 · +8.9 vs Losses
Losses47.4 · n=5 · -8.9 vs Wins
First Half44.3 · n=7 · -19.4 vs Second Half
Second Half63.7 · n=6 · +19.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ San Diego State | L 24-49 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Bowling Green | L 7-24 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/20 | @ Miami (OH) | W 44-7 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Wed 11/13 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-51 | — | 8 | 110 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Wed 11/6 | vs Ohio | W 30-3 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Kent State | W 41-21 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs MassachusettsHigh volume | W 32-3 | — | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Michigan | W 33-0 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-14 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UConn | W 41-12 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor | L 13-70 | — | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Ohio State | L 20-40 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Buffalo | 82 | 53.4 | 9.2 | 82 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 139 | 43.2 | 12.7 | 57 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Buffalo | 261 | 81.7 | 17.9 | 122 |
| 2013 Postseason | Buffalo | 692 | 78.1 | 26.6 | 431 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 692 | 78.1 | 26.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Buffalo
692 primary output · 78.1 efficiency · 26.6 usage
68.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
68.9
692 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 26.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Buffalo
48.5
261 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Chester · Chester, SC
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,174
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.