Player Dossier

2009-2012

Northern Illinois

Perez Ashford

WR • 5'11" • Shaker Heights, OH, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Perez Ashford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

22.8

Efficiency

69.4

Consistency

60.3

Season Value

55.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Northern Illinois

09101011111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Northern Illinois
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Perez Ashford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Northern Illinois. Perez Ashford reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Northern Illinois paired 534 primary output with 73.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 69.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Army

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Northern Illinois

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

41.4

Efficiency

69.4

Usage

22.8

Consistency

60.3

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 19. Iowa: 0. Unknown: 18. Army: 69. Kansas: 78. Central Michigan: 64. Toledo: 70. Eastern Michigan: 17. Kent State: 38

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 4 by 31.7. Unknown: 2 by 60. Army: 4 by 100. Kansas: 8 by 65. Central Michigan: 5 by 85.3. Toledo: 5 by 93.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 56.7. Kent State: 4 by 63.3

Split Comparison

Wins56 · n=6 · +46.5 vs Losses
Losses9.5 · n=2 · -46.5 vs Wins
First Half36.8 · n=5 · -10.5 vs Second Half
Second Half47.3 · n=4 · +10.5 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

9 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Army

Best efficiency game

100 vs Army

Result
Wed 1/2@ Florida StateL 10-314194.84.80010
Sat 12/1@ Kent StateW 44-374389.59.50016
Fri 11/23@ Eastern MichiganW 49-72178.58.50010
Thu 11/15vs ToledoW 31-245701414133
Sat 9/29vs Central MichiganW 55-2456412.812.80028
Sat 9/22vs KansasHigh volumeW 30-238789.89.80022
Sat 9/15@ ArmyW 41-4046917.317.30044
Sat 9/8vs Unknown21899013
Sat 9/1vs IowaL 17-18

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Northern Illinois

    2009-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2009201020102011201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois8352.216.5
2010 PostseasonNorthern Illinois20666.713.5123
2010 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois20666.713.50
2011 PostseasonNorthern Illinois53473.919.4328
2011 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois53473.919.40
2012 PostseasonNorthern Illinois37369.422.8-161
2012 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois37369.422.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Unknown

Game with an explosive receiving profile.

65

Primary metric

65 receiving yards with a 72.2 efficiency score.

#2

Army

69

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Wisconsin

77

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

77 receiving yards with a 85.6 efficiency score.

#4

Toledo

70

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.

#5

Central Michigan

64

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2011 Postseason · Northern Illinois

534 primary output · 73.9 efficiency · 19.4 usage

64.5

#2

2011 Regular Season · Northern Illinois

64.5

534 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 19.4 usage

#3

2012 Postseason · Northern Illinois

55.3

373 primary · 69.4 efficiency · 22.8 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

3

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2009 · Rating 0.8256

Shaker Heights · Cleveland, OH

Committed To
Northern Illinois
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2009

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,196

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Perez Ashford quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
7
Career receiving yards
1,196