Usage Score
23.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Eastern Michigan
Garrett Hoskins
TE • 6'2" • Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Garrett Hoskins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
34.3
Season Value
58.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Garrett Hoskins, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Garrett Hoskins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 537 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
48.8
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
23.8
Consistency
34.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 13. Unknown: 41. Purdue: 47. Michigan State: 102. Toledo: 103. Army: 158. Bowling Green: 8. Ohio: 14. Central Michigan: 11. Western Michigan: 27. Northern Illinois: 13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 3 by 28.9. Unknown: 2 by 100. Purdue: 3 by 100. Michigan State: 8 by 85. Toledo: 7 by 98.1. Army: 7 by 100. Bowling Green: 1 by 53.3. Ohio: 1 by 93.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 73.3. Western Michigan: 3 by 60. Northern Illinois: 2 by 43.3
Split Comparison
Wins92.5 · n=2 · +53.6 vs Losses
Losses38.9 · n=8 · -53.6 vs Wins
First Half77.3 · n=6 · +62.7 vs Second Half
Second Half14.6 · n=5 · -62.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Northern Illinois | L 7-49 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Western Michigan | W 29-23 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Central Michigan | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 11/1 | @ Ohio | L 14-45 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Bowling Green | L 3-24 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Army100 receiving yards | W 48-38 | — | 7 | 158 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | L 47-52 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 7-23 | — | 8 | 102 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Purdue | L 16-54 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ Ball State | L 26-37 | — | 3 | 13 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 48 | 53.7 | 12.4 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 217 | 100 | 11.4 | 169 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 300 | 77.5 | 25.3 | 83 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 537 | 75.9 | 23.8 | 237 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
537 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 23.8 usage
58.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
57.9
300 primary · 77.5 efficiency · 25.3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
55.1
217 primary · 100 efficiency · 11.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Creston · Grand Rapids, MI
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,102
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.