Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Eastern Michigan
Alex Gillett
QB • 6'1" • Green Springs, OH, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Alex Gillett is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
48.2
Consistency
30.2
Season Value
33.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Gillett, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Alex Gillett is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 2,399 primary output with 55.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 48.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
86.4
Efficiency
48.2
Usage
18.1
Consistency
30.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 267. Unknown: 194. Purdue: 89. Michigan State: -1. Kent State: 6. Toledo: 17. Bowling Green: 3. Ohio: 0. Central Michigan: 239. Western Michigan: 97. Northern Illinois: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 45 by 65.8. Unknown: 38 by 45.5. Purdue: 22 by 37.4. Michigan State: 2 by 0. Kent State: 3 by 20. Toledo: 3 by 50. Bowling Green: 1 by 30. Central Michigan: 31 by 63.8. Western Michigan: 10 by 91.7. Northern Illinois: 4 by 77.5
Split Comparison
Losses73.2 · n=9
First Half95.3 · n=6 · +19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half75.6 · n=5 · -19.7 vs First Half
All Games86.4 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Western Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Northern Illinois | L 7-49 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 77.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Western MichiganDual-threat | W 29-23 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 91.7 | 9 | 60 | 6.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Central Michigan3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 31-34 | 7 | 17 | 77 | 41.2 | 1 | 1 | 63.8 | 14 | 162 | 11.60 | 2 | 53 |
| Thu 11/1 | @ Ohio | L 14-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Bowling Green | L 3-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Toledo | L 47-52 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Kent State | L 14-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Michigan State | L 7-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Purdue | L 16-54 | 9 | 15 | 66 | 60.0 | 0 | 3 | 37.4 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 25 | 145 | 44.0 | 1 | 3 | 45.5 | 13 | 49 | 3.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Thu 8/30 | @ Ball State3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 26-37 | 15 | 34 | 186 | 44.1 | 3 | 0 | 65.8 | 11 | 81 | 7.40 | 1 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 1,247 | 58.5 | 32.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 2,399 | 55.1 | 34.4 | 1,152 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 2,026 | 64.4 | 29.6 | -373 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 950 | 48.2 | 18.1 | -1,076 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
414
Primary metric
414 total offense with 71.8 efficiency.
#2
Buffalo
323
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
323 total offense with 78.4 efficiency.
#3
Western Michigan
291
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
291 total offense with 52.9 efficiency.
#4
Ball State
322
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
322 total offense with 84.2 efficiency.
#5
Toledo
273
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
273 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
2,399 primary output · 55.1 efficiency · 34.4 usage
63.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
62.3
2,026 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 29.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
47.1
1,247 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 32.1 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
5
3+ takeover TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7444
Clyde · Clyde, OH
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
6,622
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.