Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2022-2025Missouri
DT • 6'4" • 323 lbs • Owasso, OK, USA
Chris McClellan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
32.3
Consistency
47.8
Season Value
47
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Missouri
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris McClellan, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Missouri. Chris McClellan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Chris McClellan played DT for Florida and Missouri. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris McClellan recorded 131 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Missouri.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Missouri paired 22 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Missouri.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
32.3
Usage
7.7
Consistency
47.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 2. Central Arkansas: 0. Kansas: 1. Louisiana: 1. South Carolina: 1. Massachusetts: 1. Alabama: 2.5. Auburn: 3. Vanderbilt: 1. Texas A&M: 1. Mississippi State: 2.5. Oklahoma: 2. Arkansas: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia: 6 by 45. Central Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana: 1 by 14.2. South Carolina: 2 by 18.3. Massachusetts: 3 by 22.5. Alabama: 2 by 33.3. Auburn: 4 by 46.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 7 by 39.2. Mississippi State: 6 by 50. Oklahoma: 6 by 45. Arkansas: 3 by 52.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | vs VirginiaSplash game | L 7-13 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Arkansas2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ OklahomaSplash game | L 6-17 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Mississippi StateSplash game | W 49-27 | 6 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Texas A&M | L 17-38 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Vanderbilt | L 10-17 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ AuburnSplash game | W 23-17 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs AlabamaSplash game | L 24-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Massachusetts | W 42-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs South Carolina | W 29-20 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Louisiana | W 52-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kansas | W 42-31 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Central Arkansas | W 61-6 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Florida
2022-2023
Opening stop
Missouri
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Florida | 5 | 15.3 | 4.3 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Florida | 2.5 | 13.4 | 4.3 | -2.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | Missouri | 13 | 22.5 | 6.6 | 10.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Missouri | 13 | 22.5 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Missouri | 22 | 32.3 | 7.7 | 9 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Missouri | 22 | 32.3 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#2
Arkansas
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#3
LSU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#4
Missouri
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#5
Auburn
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Missouri
22 primary output · 32.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
47
#2
2025 Regular Season · Missouri
47
22 primary · 32.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Missouri
30.1
13 primary · 22.5 efficiency · 6.6 usage
1
Impact games
10
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9536
Owasso · Owasso, OK
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
131
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.