Usage Score
2.2
Player Dossier
2009-2013Central Michigan
FB • 6'2" • Birmingham, MI, USA
Adam Fenton leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 70.8 efficiency.
Usage Score
2.2
Efficiency
70.8
Consistency
43.3
Season Value
53.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adam Fenton, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Adam Fenton leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 70.8 efficiency.
Adam Fenton played FB for Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Adam Fenton recorded 93 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 76 primary output with 70.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 70.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
10.9
Efficiency
70.8
Usage
2.2
Consistency
43.3
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. UNLV: 12. Toledo: 8. Ohio: 1. Northern Illinois: 6. Ball State: 0. Western Michigan: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 100. Toledo: 1 by 66.7. Ohio: 1 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 1 by 50. Western Michigan: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 5 | 41.7 | 1.5 | 5 |
| 2012 Postseason | Central Michigan | 12 | 33.3 | 1.4 | 7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 12 | 33.3 | 1.4 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 76 | 70.8 | 2.2 | 64 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
25
Primary metric
25 scrimmage yards and 4.1 usage.
#2
Western Michigan
24
Primary metric
Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24 scrimmage yards and 3.8 usage.
#3
Western Kentucky
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 2 usage.
#4
UNLV
12
Primary metric
Loss with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#5
Eastern Michigan
5
Primary metric
Loss with 5 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
5 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
76 primary output · 70.8 efficiency · 2.2 usage
53.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Central Michigan
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan
37.4
5 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 1.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.84
Ernest W. Seaholm · Birmingham, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
93
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.