Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2009-2013Central Michigan
TE • 6'2" • Holland, MI, USA
A.J. Westendorp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Westendorp, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan. A.J. Westendorp reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
A.J. Westendorp played TE for Central Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, A.J. Westendorp recorded 4 passing yards, 25 rushing yards, and 38 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Central Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 42-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 38 | 63.4 | 6.4 | 38 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | -38 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20
Primary metric
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#2
Navy
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Central Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2013 Regular Season · Central Michigan
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Central Michigan
66.3
38 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7444
Holland Christian · Holland, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
38
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.