Usage Score
30.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Central Michigan
WR • 5'10" • Rochester Hills, MI, USA
Cody Wilson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
30.1
Efficiency
73.9
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
57.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Cody Wilson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 1,137 primary output with 83.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
64.6
Efficiency
73.9
Usage
30.1
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Western Kentucky
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 101. Unknown: 16. Michigan State: 54. Iowa: 105. Northern Illinois: 111. Toledo: 108. Navy: 35. Ball State: 111. Akron: 23. Western Michigan: 81. Eastern Michigan: 45. Miami (OH): 24. Massachusetts: 26
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 10 by 67.3. Unknown: 2 by 53.3. Michigan State: 6 by 60. Iowa: 8 by 87.5. Northern Illinois: 8 by 92.5. Toledo: 9 by 80. Navy: 3 by 77.8. Ball State: 7 by 100. Akron: 5 by 30.7. Western Michigan: 7 by 77.1. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Massachusetts: 5 by 34.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-21 | — | 10 | 101 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 17 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Massachusetts | W 42-21 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Miami (OH) | W 30-16 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 34-31 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Western Michigan | L 31-42 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Akron | W 35-14 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 30-41 | — | 7 | 111 | 15.4 | 15.90 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Navy | L 13-31 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-50 | — | 9 | 108 | 9.5 | 12 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-55 | — | 8 | 111 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Iowa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 32-31 | — | 8 | 105 | 10.4 | 13.10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Michigan State | L 7-41 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 226 | 55.6 | 9.4 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 226 | 55.6 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,137 | 83.4 | 27.9 | 911 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 526 | 69.4 | 23.1 | -611 |
| 2012 Postseason | Central Michigan | 840 | 73.9 | 30.1 | 314 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 840 | 73.9 | 30.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
185
Primary metric
185 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
#5
Western Kentucky
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 67.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Central Michigan
1,137 primary output · 83.4 efficiency · 27.9 usage
69.6
#2
2012 Postseason · Central Michigan
57.9
840 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Central Michigan
57.9
840 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
12
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Adams · Rochester, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,729
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cody Wilson quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit