Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Indiana
LB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • London, OH, USA
Isaiah Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.3
Efficiency
35.6
Consistency
39.8
Season Value
30.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Jones, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Indiana. Isaiah Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.6 disruption score.
Isaiah Jones played LB for Indiana. Across 4 tracked seasons, Isaiah Jones recorded 122 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Indiana.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Indiana paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
16
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
35.6
Usage
10.3
Consistency
39.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 1. Oregon: 1.5. Alabama: 0. Old Dominion: 2. Kennesaw State: 1. Unknown: 3.5. Illinois: 3. Iowa: 1. Oregon: 4. Michigan State: 1. UCLA: 2. Maryland: 0. Penn State: 0.5. Wisconsin: 0. Purdue: 0. Ohio State: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 18.3. Oregon: 6 by 40. Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Old Dominion: 4 by 36.7. Kennesaw State: 4 by 26.7. Unknown: 4 by 51.7. Illinois: 4 by 46.7. Iowa: 8 by 43.3. Oregon: 8 by 73.3. Michigan State: 5 by 30.8. UCLA: 8 by 53.3. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 5 by 25.8. Wisconsin: 4 by 16.7. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 7 by 69.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/20 | vs Miami | W 27-21 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 1/10 | vs Oregon | W 56-22 | 6 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 38-3 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Ohio State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 13-10 | 7 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Purdue | W 56-3 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Maryland | W 55-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UCLA | W 56-6 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan State | W 38-13 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ OregonSplash game | W 30-20 | 8 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 20-15 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs IllinoisSplash game | W 63-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/12 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kennesaw State | W 56-9 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 27-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Indiana
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Indiana | 4 | 17.9 | 4.2 | 4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Indiana | 4 | 17.9 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 24.5 | 35.6 | 10.3 | 20.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 24.5 | 35.6 | 10.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.3 takeover score.
#2
Ohio State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3.5
Primary metric
Game with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.
#4
Michigan State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47.7 takeover score.
#5
Illinois
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Indiana
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
34.9
#2
2025 Postseason · Indiana
30.6
24.5 primary · 35.6 efficiency · 10.3 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Indiana
30.6
24.5 primary · 35.6 efficiency · 10.3 usage
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8837
Valparaiso · Valparaiso, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
122
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.