Usage Score
10.4
Player Dossier
2009-2010Minnesota
WR • 6'0" • Maplewood, MO, USA
Bryant Allen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
57.7
Consistency
27.4
Season Value
48.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryant Allen, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Minnesota. Bryant Allen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Bryant Allen played WR for Minnesota. Across 2 tracked seasons, Bryant Allen recorded 3 rushing yards, 247 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 202 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
22.4
Efficiency
57.7
Usage
10.4
Consistency
27.4
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 5. Northern Illinois: 37. Northwestern: 14. Wisconsin: 73. Purdue: 46. Penn State: 3. Ohio State: 4. Michigan State: 9. Illinois: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 1 by 33.3. Northern Illinois: 3 by 82.2. Northwestern: 2 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 2 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 76.7. Penn State: 1 by 20. Ohio State: 1 by 26.7. Michigan State: 1 by 60. Illinois: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/13 | @ Illinois | W 38-34 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Michigan State | L 8-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Ohio State | L 10-52 | — | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Penn State | L 21-33 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Purdue | L 17-28 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Wisconsin | L 23-41 | — | 2 | 73 | 36.5 | 36.50 | 0 | 60 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Northwestern | L 28-29 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Northern Illinois | L 23-34 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs USC | L 21-32 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 45 | 60 | 9.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 45 | 60 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 202 | 57.7 | 10.4 | 157 |
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73
Primary metric
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Illinois
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Minnesota
202 primary output · 57.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
48.6
#2
2009 Postseason · Minnesota
25.4
45 primary · 60 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Minnesota
25.4
45 primary · 60 efficiency · 9.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.76
Nazareth Academy · La Grange Park, IL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
247
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.