Player Stats

Charlie Moore College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,114
Receptions
76
Touchdowns
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonOklahoma State0-00-
2010 Regular SeasonOklahoma State3348129.9
2011 Regular SeasonOklahoma State3356049.4
2012 PostseasonOklahoma State12442163.8
2012 Regular SeasonOklahoma State1231500563.8
2013 PostseasonOklahoma State13453066.4
2013 Regular SeasonOklahoma State1331415566.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Oklahoma State paired 468 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Oklahoma State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

36

Efficiency

81.5

Usage

13.4

Consistency

53.2

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 53. Mississippi State: 18. UTSA: 43. Lamar: 48. West Virginia: 25. Kansas State: 6. TCU: 48. Iowa State: 16. Texas Tech: 12. Kansas: 22. Texas: 83. Baylor: 67. Oklahoma: 27

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 4 by 88.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 30. UTSA: 3 by 95.6. Lamar: 4 by 80. West Virginia: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 1 by 40. TCU: 3 by 100. Iowa State: 2 by 53.3. Texas Tech: 1 by 80. Kansas: 1 by 100. Texas: 6 by 92.2. Baylor: 4 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins36.3 · Games = 10 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses35 · Games = 3 · -1.3 vs Wins