Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2009-2011Oklahoma State
Michael Harrison
WR • 6'1" • Atlanta, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Michael Harrison reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.5
Consistency
32.3
Season Value
49.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
09101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Harrison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Michael Harrison reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Michael Harrison played WR for Oklahoma State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Michael Harrison recorded 390 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Oklahoma State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 255 primary output with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
25.5
Efficiency
59.5
Usage
6
Consistency
32.3
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 16. Louisiana: 32. Arizona: 13. Tulsa: 1. Texas A&M: 9. Kansas: 81. Missouri: 71. Baylor: 1. Kansas State: 21. Oklahoma: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 1 by 100. Louisiana: 3 by 71.1. Arizona: 2 by 43.3. Tulsa: 1 by 6.7. Texas A&M: 2 by 30. Kansas: 4 by 100. Missouri: 3 by 100. Baylor: 1 by 6.7. Kansas State: 2 by 70. Oklahoma: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.5 · Games = 10
First Half14.2 · Games = 5 · -22.6 vs Second Half
Second Half36.8 · Games = 5 · +22.6 vs First Half
All Games25.5 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/3 | vs Stanford | W 41-38 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs Oklahoma | W 44-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Kansas State | W 52-45 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Baylor | W 59-24 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Missouri | W 45-24 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kansas | W 70-28 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Texas A&M | W 30-29 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Tulsa | W 59-33 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fri 9/9 | vs Arizona | W 37-14 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Louisiana | W 61-34 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 135 | 58.7 | 7.2 | 135 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 255 | 59.5 | 6 | 120 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 255 | 59.5 | 6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Oklahoma State
255 primary output · 59.5 efficiency · 6 usage
49.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
49.4
255 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 6 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
40.4
135 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 7.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7889
Hillcrest · Dallas, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
390
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.