Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025SMU
DE • 6'4" • 248 lbs • Washington, DC, USA
Isaiah Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
13.4
Efficiency
39.3
Consistency
57
Season Value
52.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Smith, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Isaiah Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.3 disruption score.
Isaiah Smith played DE for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Isaiah Smith recorded 117 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 32 primary output with 39.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
39.3
Usage
13.4
Consistency
57
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 2. East Texas A&M: 0. Baylor: 2. Missouri State: 1.5. TCU: 2.5. Syracuse: 3. Stanford: 3. Clemson: 4. Wake Forest: 3. Miami: 1. Boston College: 8. Louisville: 2. California: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 2 by 28.3. Baylor: 8 by 53.3. Missouri State: 3 by 27.5. TCU: 5 by 45.8. Syracuse: 4 by 46.7. Stanford: 2 by 38.3. Clemson: 5 by 60.8. Wake Forest: 4 by 46.7. Miami: 5 by 30.8. Boston College: 9 by 87.5. Louisville: 2 by 28.3. California: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
87.5 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs ArizonaSplash game | W 24-19 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs LouisvilleSplash game | W 38-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College2+ sacks · Splash game | W 45-13 | 9 | 7 | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami | W 26-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Wake ForestSplash game | L 12-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ ClemsonSplash game | W 35-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs StanfordSplash game | W 34-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs SyracuseSplash game | W 31-18 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCUSplash game | L 24-35 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri State | W 28-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs BaylorSplash game | L 45-48 | 8 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs East Texas A&M | W 42-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 6.5 | 14.7 | 7.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 14.5 | 30.6 | 8.4 | 8 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 22.5 | 27.3 | 6.9 | 8 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 22.5 | 27.3 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 32 | 39.3 | 13.4 | 9.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 32 | 39.3 | 13.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 70.8 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.4 takeover score.
#3
Virginia
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.7 takeover score.
#4
UCF
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#5
Houston
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · SMU
32 primary output · 39.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage
52.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
52.4
32 primary · 39.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · SMU
39
22.5 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 6.9 usage
3
Impact games
23
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Blue Springs · Blue Springs, MO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
117
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.