Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025Louisville
Nate Kurisky
TE • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Washington, DC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Nate Kurisky reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
46
Consistency
40.4
Season Value
48.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Louisville
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Kurisky, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Louisville. Nate Kurisky reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Louisville paired 117 primary output with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Louisville
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
15.7
Efficiency
46
Usage
8.9
Consistency
40.4
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: -3. Pittsburgh: 31. Virginia: 31. Miami: 18. Boston College: 9. Virginia Tech: 12. California: 41. Clemson: 7. SMU: 5. Kentucky: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 1 by 0. Pittsburgh: 4 by 51.7. Virginia: 4 by 51.7. Miami: 2 by 60. Boston College: 1 by 60. Virginia Tech: 2 by 40. California: 2 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 23.3. SMU: 1 by 33.3. Kentucky: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins12.2 · Games = 6 · -8.8 vs Losses
Losses21 · Games = 4 · +8.8 vs Wins
First Half17.2 · Games = 5 · +3 vs Second Half
Second Half14.2 · Games = 5 · -3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Kentucky | W 41-0 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ SMU | L 6-38 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Clemson | L 19-20 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 1 | 5 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs California | L 26-29 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-16 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Boston College | W 38-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 10/17 | @ Miami | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Virginia | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Bowling Green | W 40-17 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Louisville | 141 | 47.5 | 9.7 | 141 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisville | 141 | 47.5 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Louisville | 117 | 59.5 | 11.5 | -24 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisville | 117 | 59.5 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Louisville | 157 | 46 | 8.9 | 40 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami
50
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Pittsburgh
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 51.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Louisville
117 primary output · 59.5 efficiency · 11.5 usage
52
#2
2024 Regular Season · Louisville
52
117 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 11.5 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Louisville
48.4
157 primary · 46 efficiency · 8.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.82
Williamson · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- North Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
415
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.