Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Tulsa paired 2,875 primary output with 61.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Cody Green College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 5,198
- Passing yards
- 4,588
- Rushing yards
- 610
- Touchdowns
- 37
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Nebraska | 9 | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 29.5 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Nebraska | 9 | 457 | 317 | 140 | 4 | 29.5 |
| 2010 Postseason | Nebraska | 9 | 43 | 45 | -2 | 0 | 36 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Nebraska | 9 | 393 | 295 | 98 | 4 | 36 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Postseason | Tulsa | 13 | 151 | 93 | 58 | 1 | 66.2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 13 | 2,724 | 2,499 | 225 | 20 | 66.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 8 | 1,412 | 1,339 | 73 | 8 | 52.3 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 51.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 250 yards of offense and 82.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
176.5
Efficiency
51.4
Usage
14.6
Consistency
76.3
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 186. Colorado State: 234. Oklahoma: 232. Iowa State: 231. Rice: 200. UTEP: 250. UTSA: 52. North Texas: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 39 by 55. Colorado State: 47 by 54.1. Oklahoma: 37 by 52.9. Iowa State: 36 by 52.2. Rice: 36 by 48.2. UTEP: 22 by 82.6. UTSA: 22 by 43.9. North Texas: 8 by 21.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins242 · Games = 2 · +87.3 vs Losses
Losses154.7 · Games = 6 · -87.3 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cody Green
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.