Player Stats

Braden Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
188
Rushing yards
44
Receiving yards
144
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonKansas State441833036.2
2010 PostseasonKansas State8440046.6
2010 Regular SeasonKansas State867463146.6
2011 PostseasonKansas State3880037.3
2011 Regular SeasonKansas State321714037.3
2012 Regular SeasonKansas State6471334136.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Kansas State paired 71 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 27.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Kansas State

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

7.8

Efficiency

27.8

Usage

3.4

Consistency

42.2

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 9. North Texas: 24. Oklahoma: 1. Iowa State: 9. TCU: 3. Texas: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 2 by 46.9. North Texas: 2 by 56.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 8.3. Iowa State: 3 by 25. TCU: 1 by 25. Texas: 2 by 5.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half11.3 · Games = 3 · +7.0 vs Second Half
Second Half4.3 · Games = 3 · -7.0 vs First Half