Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Kansas State paired 71 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Kansas State | 4 | 41 | 8 | 33 | 0 | 36.2 |
| 2010 Postseason | Kansas State | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 46.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas State | 8 | 67 | 4 | 63 | 1 | 46.6 |
| 2011 Postseason | Kansas State | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 37.3 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas State | 3 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 37.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas State | 6 | 47 | 13 | 34 | 1 | 36.5 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Kansas State paired 71 primary output with 42.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 27.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
7.8
Efficiency
27.8
Usage
3.4
Consistency
42.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 9. North Texas: 24. Oklahoma: 1. Iowa State: 9. TCU: 3. Texas: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 2 by 46.9. North Texas: 2 by 56.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 8.3. Iowa State: 3 by 25. TCU: 1 by 25. Texas: 2 by 5.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.