Player Stats

John Hubert College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,408
Rushing yards
2,993
Receiving yards
415
Touchdowns
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonKansas State00000-
2010 Regular SeasonKansas State728280017.2
2011 PostseasonKansas State133237-5075.5
2011 Regular SeasonKansas State131,126933193475.5
2012 PostseasonKansas State13715516172
2012 Regular SeasonKansas State13974892821572
2013 PostseasonKansas State1382802175.4
2013 Regular SeasonKansas State131,0959681271075.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Kansas State paired 1,158 primary output with 49.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 51.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Kansas State

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

90.5

Efficiency

51.2

Usage

29.8

Consistency

65.2

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 82. North Dakota State: 31. Louisiana: 91. Massachusetts: 168. Texas: 52. Oklahoma State: 37. Baylor: 90. West Virginia: 101. Iowa State: 105. Texas Tech: 158. TCU: 25. Oklahoma: 17. Kansas: 220

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 17 by 51.3. North Dakota State: 11 by 26.1. Louisiana: 21 by 37.5. Massachusetts: 20 by 76. Texas: 14 by 36.8. Oklahoma State: 9 by 43.9. Baylor: 15 by 62.5. West Virginia: 20 by 49.3. Iowa State: 15 by 72.9. Texas Tech: 24 by 70.1. TCU: 6 by 43.4. Oklahoma: 9 by 19.7. Kansas: 30 by 76.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins118.8 · Games = 8 · +73.3 vs Losses
Losses45.4 · Games = 5 · -73.3 vs Wins