Usage Score
29.8
Player Dossier
2009-2013Kansas State
John Hubert
RB • 5'7" • Waco, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
John Hubert leans workhorse runner traits and 51.2 efficiency.
Efficiency
51.2
Consistency
65.2
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Kansas State
0910111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Kansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Hubert, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Kansas State. John Hubert leans workhorse runner traits and 51.2 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Kansas State paired 1,158 primary output with 49.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Kansas State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
90.5
Efficiency
51.2
Usage
29.8
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 82. Unknown: 31. Louisiana: 91. Massachusetts: 168. Texas: 52. Oklahoma State: 37. Baylor: 90. West Virginia: 101. Iowa State: 105. Texas Tech: 158. TCU: 25. Oklahoma: 17. Kansas: 220
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 17 by 51.3. Unknown: 11 by 26.1. Louisiana: 21 by 37.5. Massachusetts: 20 by 76. Texas: 14 by 36.8. Oklahoma State: 9 by 43.9. Baylor: 15 by 62.5. West Virginia: 20 by 49.3. Iowa State: 15 by 72.9. Texas Tech: 24 by 70.1. TCU: 6 by 43.4. Oklahoma: 9 by 19.7. Kansas: 30 by 76.4
Split Comparison
Wins118.8 · n=8 · +69.8 vs Losses
Losses49 · n=4 · -69.8 vs Wins
First Half78.7 · n=7 · -25.6 vs Second Half
Second Half104.3 · n=6 · +25.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
76.4 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Michigan | W 31-14 | 16 | 80 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.8 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Kansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-10 | 30 | 220 | 7.30 | 1 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Oklahoma | L 31-41 | 9 | 17 | 1.90 | 0 | — | — | 1.9 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs TCU | W 33-31 | 6 | 25 | 4.20 | 0 | — | — | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Texas Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 49-26 | 23 | 157 | 6.80 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Iowa State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 41-7 | 15 | 105 | 7 | 2 | — | — | 7 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs West Virginia | W 35-12 | 19 | 86 | 4.50 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5.0 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Baylor | L 25-35 | 15 | 90 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Oklahoma State | L 29-33 | 7 | 30 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4.1 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Texas2+ TD | L 21-31 | 12 | 41 | 3.40 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Massachusetts100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 37-7 | 18 | 118 | 6.60 | 0 | 2 | 50 | 8.4 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Louisiana2+ TD | W 48-27 | 18 | 56 | 3.10 | 2 | 3 | 35 | 4.3 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 23 | 2.30 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas State
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kansas State | 28 | 23.1 | 3 | 28 |
| 2011 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,158 | 49.7 | 29.6 | 1,130 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,158 | 49.7 | 29.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,045 | 50.2 | 28.8 | -113 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,045 | 50.2 | 28.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,177 | 51.2 | 29.8 | 132 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,177 | 51.2 | 29.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
220
Primary metric
220 scrimmage yards and 54.5 usage.
#2
Unknown
176
Primary metric
Game with 176 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
176 scrimmage yards and 30.5 usage.
#3
Miami
166
Primary metric
Win with 166 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
166 scrimmage yards and 32.1 usage.
#4
Iowa State
148
Primary metric
Win with 148 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
148 scrimmage yards and 34.7 usage.
#5
Massachusetts
168
Primary metric
Win with 168 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
168 scrimmage yards and 37.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Kansas State
1,158 primary output · 49.7 efficiency · 29.6 usage
62.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Kansas State
62.2
1,158 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 29.6 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Kansas State
61.6
1,177 primary · 51.2 efficiency · 29.8 usage
Milestones
15
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8333
Midway · Waco, TX
- Committed To
- Kansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,408
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.