Player Stats

Anthony Talbert College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
142
Receptions
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonNC State0-00-
2010 Regular SeasonNC State0-00-
2011 Regular SeasonNC State0-00-
2012 PostseasonNC State2329057.7
2012 Regular SeasonNC State2119057.7
2013 Regular SeasonOhio4694068.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Ohio paired 94 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, Ohio.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Akron

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Ohio

Games

4

Receiving Yards / G

23.5

Efficiency

72.5

Usage

8.2

Consistency

72.4

Best Game by takeover score

Akron

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 36. North Texas: 25. Marshall: 1. Akron: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 1 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 83.3. Marshall: 1 by 6.7. Akron: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins19.3 · Games = 3 · -16.7 vs Losses
Losses36 · Games = 1 · +16.7 vs Wins