Player Stats

Ian Thompson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
284
Receptions
36

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonLouisiana0-00-
2010 Regular SeasonLouisiana1-00100
2011 PostseasonLouisiana6111062.4
2011 Regular SeasonLouisiana6988062.4
2012 PostseasonLouisiana8327055
2012 Regular SeasonLouisiana81392055
2013 Regular SeasonLouisiana61066049.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Louisiana paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Louisiana

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

11

Efficiency

46.7

Usage

11.7

Consistency

57.7

Best Game by takeover score

UL Monroe

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 4. Texas State: 7. Western Kentucky: 9. Arkansas State: 8. New Mexico State: 17. UL Monroe: 21

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 13.3. Texas State: 2 by 23.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 60. Arkansas State: 2 by 26.7. New Mexico State: 2 by 56.7. UL Monroe: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins10.3 · Games = 4 · -2.3 vs Losses
Losses12.5 · Games = 2 · +2.3 vs Wins