Usage Score
29.5
Player Dossier
2009-2012TCU
Josh Boyce
WR • 6'0" • Copperas Cove, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Josh Boyce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · TCU
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Boyce, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · TCU. Josh Boyce reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
TCU paired 998 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
68.5
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
29.5
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 91. Unknown: 102. Kansas: 66. Virginia: 22. SMU: 42. Iowa State: 64. Baylor: 85. Texas Tech: 52. Oklahoma State: 74. West Virginia: 180. Kansas State: 69. Texas: 0. Oklahoma: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 5 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Kansas: 5 by 88. Virginia: 4 by 36.7. SMU: 3 by 93.3. Iowa State: 6 by 71.1. Baylor: 8 by 70.8. Texas Tech: 7 by 49.5. Oklahoma State: 7 by 70.5. West Virginia: 6 by 100. Kansas State: 6 by 76.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 58.7
Split Comparison
Wins65.8 · n=6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses65.7 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half67.4 · n=7 · -2.4 vs Second Half
Second Half69.8 · n=6 · +2.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/30 | @ Michigan State | L 16-17 | — | 5 | 91 | 18.2 | 18.20 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Oklahoma | L 17-24 | — | 5 | 44 | 7.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Texas | W 20-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Kansas State | L 10-23 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 39-38 | — | 6 | 180 | 30 | 30 | 2 | 94 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-36 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Texas Tech | L 53-56 | — | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ BaylorHigh volume | W 49-21 | — | 8 | 85 | 8.8 | 10.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Iowa State | L 23-37 | — | 6 | 64 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ SMU | W 24-16 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Virginia | W 27-7 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas | W 20-6 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 102 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 2 | 66 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | TCU | 646 | 85.2 | 17.1 | 646 |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 646 | 85.2 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | TCU | 998 | 90.4 | 26.7 | 352 |
| 2011 Regular Season | TCU | 998 | 90.4 | 26.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | TCU | 891 | 76.3 | 29.5 | -107 |
| 2012 Regular Season | TCU | 891 | 76.3 | 29.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
180
Primary metric
180 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
BYU
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
163
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · TCU
998 primary output · 90.4 efficiency · 26.7 usage
71.7
#2
2011 Regular Season · TCU
71.7
998 primary · 90.4 efficiency · 26.7 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · TCU
66.5
891 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 29.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8667
Copperas Cove · Copperas Cove, TX
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,535
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.