Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Louisville
D'Angelo Hutchinson
DB • 6'3" • 200 lbs • Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
D'Angelo Hutchinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.5
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
22
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisville
22232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D'Angelo Hutchinson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Louisville. D'Angelo Hutchinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Louisville paired 0 primary output with 8.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Louisville
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
8.3
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 0. Unknown: 0. James Madison: 0. Bowling Green: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Virginia: 0.5. Miami: 1. Boston College: 3. Virginia Tech: 0.5. California: 2. Clemson: 0.5. SMU: 0. Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. James Madison: 8 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 7 by 39.2. Pittsburgh: 5 by 20.8. Virginia: 11 by 50.8. Miami: 5 by 30.8. Boston College: 9 by 67.5. Virginia Tech: 7 by 34.2. California: 3 by 32.5. Clemson: 3 by 17.5. SMU: 10 by 41.7. Kentucky: 10 by 41.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.7 · n=8 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · n=4 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
67.5 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | vs Toledo | W 27-22 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Kentucky10+ tackles | W 41-0 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ SMU10+ tackles | L 6-38 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Clemson | L 19-20 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs California | L 26-29 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-16 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Boston College | W 38-24 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 10/17 | @ Miami | W 24-21 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Virginia10+ tackles | L 27-30 | 11 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Pittsburgh | W 34-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Bowling Green | W 40-17 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/5 | vs James Madison | W 28-14 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | 8.4 | 1.2 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Louisville | 0 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Louisville | 5 | 20.5 | 3.5 | 5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisville | 5 | 20.5 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Louisville | 8.5 | 33.5 | 8.3 | 3.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Louisville | 8.5 | 33.5 | 8.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Clemson
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 36.2 takeover score.
#4
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 34.6 takeover score.
#5
California
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Louisville
0 primary output · 8.4 efficiency · 1.2 usage
36.5
#2
2023 Postseason · Louisville
35.5
0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 1.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Louisville
35.5
0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 1.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8515
Northeast · St. Petersburg, FL
- Committed To
- Louisville
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
147
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.