Usage Score
41.4
Player Dossier
2009-2011Toledo
Eric Page
WR • 5'10" • Toledo, OH, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Eric Page reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61.6
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo
0910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Page, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo. Eric Page reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Toledo paired 1,159 primary output with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Toledo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
86.4
Efficiency
61.6
Usage
41.4
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 59. Unknown: 60. Ohio State: 145. Boise State: 69. Syracuse: 168. Temple: 26. Eastern Michigan: 109. Bowling Green: 37. Miami (OH): 51. Northern Illinois: 149. Western Michigan: 68. Central Michigan: 96
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 13 by 30.3. Unknown: 5 by 80. Ohio State: 12 by 80.6. Boise State: 8 by 57.5. Syracuse: 14 by 80. Temple: 4 by 43.3. Eastern Michigan: 11 by 66.1. Bowling Green: 6 by 41.1. Miami (OH): 6 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 9 by 100. Western Michigan: 10 by 45.3. Central Michigan: 11 by 58.2
Split Comparison
Wins63.7 · n=7 · -69.0 vs Losses
Losses132.8 · n=4 · +69.0 vs Wins
First Half87.8 · n=6 · +2.8 vs Second Half
Second Half85 · n=6 · -2.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Air ForceHigh volume | W 42-41 | — | 13 | 59 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Central MichiganHigh volume | W 44-17 | — | 11 | 96 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Western MichiganHigh volume | W 66-63 | — | 10 | 68 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Tue 11/1 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 60-63 | — | 9 | 149 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 5 | 60 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH) | W 49-28 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-21 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 54-16 | — | 11 | 109 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Temple | W 36-13 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-33 | — | 14 | 168 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Boise StateHigh volume | L 15-40 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 22-27 | — | 12 | 145 | 10.8 | 12.10 | 2 | 66 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,159 | 83.1 | 30.6 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 1,105 | 73.8 | 42.2 | -54 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,105 | 73.8 | 42.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 1,037 | 61.6 | 41.4 | -68 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,037 | 61.6 | 41.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
168
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
168 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 92.1 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 80.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
1,159 primary output · 83.1 efficiency · 30.6 usage
70.4
#2
2010 Postseason · Toledo
70.3
1,105 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 42.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
70.3
1,105 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 42.2 usage
Milestones
16
100+ receiving yards
17
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8311
Springfield · Springfield, OH
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,301
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.