Usage / Role
52%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2009-2011Navy
FB • 6'0" • Conroe, TX, USA
Alexander Teich leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.9 efficiency.
Usage / Role
52%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
32
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Navy
Snapshot
Player Story
Alexander Teich built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a FB from Conroe, TX wearing No. 39, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Alexander Teich's career was his backfield work: 2,122 rushing...
Read the storyAlexander Teich, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Navy. Alexander Teich leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.9 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Navy | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44.8 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Navy | 12 | 401 | 376 | 25 | 0 | 44.8 |
| 2010 Postseason | Navy | 13 | 47 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 63.4 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Navy | 13 | 902 | 825 | 77 | 7 | 63.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Navy | 11 | 908 | 883 | 25 | 4 | 74.7 |
Related Context
Alexander Teich played FB for Navy. Across 3 tracked seasons, Alexander Teich recorded 37 passing yards, 2,122 rushing yards, and 136 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Navy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Navy paired 908 primary output with 49.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
73
Efficiency
54.9
Usage
20.2
Consistency
40.9
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 47. Maryland: 22. Georgia Southern: 20. Louisiana Tech: 23. Air Force: 38. Wake Forest: 49. SMU: 95. Notre Dame: 241. Duke: 69. East Carolina: 157. Central Michigan: 53. Arkansas State: 88. Army: 47
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 12 by 40.1. Maryland: 7 by 32.7. Georgia Southern: 5 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 47.9. Air Force: 8 by 49.5. Wake Forest: 11 by 45.4. SMU: 21 by 47.1. Notre Dame: 27 by 87.2. Duke: 8 by 74.3. East Carolina: 14 by 96.7. Central Michigan: 12 by 46. Arkansas State: 13 by 73. Army: 11 by 44.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
96.7 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/24 | @ San Diego State | L 14-35 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3.9 |
| Sat 12/11 | @ Army | W 31-17 | 11 | 47 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Arkansas State | W 35-19 | 12 | 86 | 7.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6.8 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Central Michigan2+ TD | W 38-37 | 12 | 53 | 4.40 | 2 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ East Carolina100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 76-35 | 14 | 157 | 11.20 | 1 | — | — | 11.2 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Duke | L 31-34 | 7 | 43 | 6.10 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 8.6 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Notre Dame100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-17 | 26 | 210 | 8.10 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 8.9 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs SMU2+ TD | W 28-21 | 21 | 95 | 4.50 | 2 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Wake Forest | W 28-27 | 10 | 43 | 4.30 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Air Force | L 6-14 | 8 | 38 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 37-23 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Georgia Southern | W 13-7 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 |
| Mon 9/6 | @ Maryland | L 14-17 | 7 | 22 | 3.10 | 0 | — | — | 3.1 |
Player Story
Alexander Teich built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a FB from Conroe, TX wearing No. 39, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Alexander Teich's career was his backfield work: 2,122 rushing yards, 403 carries, 9 rushing touchdowns, and 136 receiving yards across 36 career games in the available record. His career also includes 37 passing yards, 136 receiving yards, and 603 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Alexander Teich's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Navy
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Navy | 401 | 51.6 | 10.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Navy | 401 | 51.6 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Navy | 949 | 54.9 | 20.2 | 548 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Navy | 949 | 54.9 | 20.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Navy | 908 | 49.9 | 27.8 | -41 |
#1 Featured game
vs Notre Dame
Week 8 · W 35-17 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
241
Scrimmage Yards
95.7 takeover
241 scrimmage yards and 44.3 usage.
#2
@ Pittsburgh
Week 3 · L 14-27
103
Scrimmage Yards
82 takeover
Loss with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#3
vs Air Force
Week 5 · L 34-35
162
Scrimmage Yards
81.6 takeover
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
162 scrimmage yards and 39.4 usage.
#4
@ East Carolina
Week 10 · W 76-35
157
Scrimmage Yards
73.6 takeover
Win with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
157 scrimmage yards and 20.6 usage.
#5
@ South Carolina
Week 3 · L 21-24
95
Scrimmage Yards
70 takeover
Loss with 95 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
95 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Navy
908 primary output · 49.9 efficiency · 27.8 usage
74.7
#2
2010 Postseason · Navy
63.4
949 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Navy
63.4
949 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
4
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.