Player Stats

Kasey Carrier College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,564
Rushing yards
3,233
Receiving yards
331
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonNew Mexico636126992052.8
2010 Regular SeasonNew Mexico11494373121245.1
2011 Regular SeasonNew Mexico00000-
2012 Regular SeasonNew Mexico121,5441,469751580.1
2013 Regular SeasonNew Mexico101,1651,122431070.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

New Mexico paired 1,544 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 56.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · New Mexico

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

116.5

Efficiency

56.8

Usage

32.8

Consistency

54.6

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 54. UTEP: 291. Pittsburgh: 22. UNLV: 192. New Mexico State: 126. Wyoming: 147. Utah State: 69. San Diego State: 72. Air Force: 179. Colorado State: 13

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 20 by 28.1. UTEP: 41 by 73.9. Pittsburgh: 7 by 32.7. UNLV: 25 by 80. New Mexico State: 14 by 87.5. Wyoming: 28 by 47.9. Utah State: 14 by 51.3. San Diego State: 10 by 75. Air Force: 27 by 69.1. Colorado State: 6 by 22.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins198.7 · Games = 3 · +117.4 vs Losses
Losses81.3 · Games = 7 · -117.4 vs Wins