Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2009-2010Western Michigan
WR • 6'4" • Perry, GA, USA
Trey Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.2
Efficiency
68.4
Consistency
60.1
Season Value
41.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trey Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Western Michigan. Trey Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Western Michigan paired 147 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
12
Efficiency
68.4
Usage
4.2
Consistency
60.1
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 9. Toledo: 22. Ball State: 7. Akron: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 1 by 60. Toledo: 1 by 100. Ball State: 1 by 46.7. Akron: 1 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Michigan
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 147 | 66.7 | 8.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 48 | 68.4 | 4.2 | -99 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 68.3 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Western Michigan
147 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 8.7 usage
58.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Western Michigan
41.2
48 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 4.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8033
Perry · Perry, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
195
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Trey Smith quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit