Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Western Michigan
Clark Mussman
TE • 6'3" • Ogden Dunes, IN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Clark Mussman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.2
Consistency
63
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan
0910111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Western Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Clark Mussman, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan. Clark Mussman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Clark Mussman played TE for Western Michigan. Across 5 tracked seasons, Clark Mussman recorded 359 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Western Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Western Michigan paired 195 primary output with 65.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
24.4
Efficiency
65.2
Usage
14.6
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 26. Unknown: 21. Northwestern: 29. Iowa: 6. Kent State: 13. Toledo: 62. Central Michigan: 6. Northern Illinois: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 2 by 86.7. Unknown: 3 by 46.7. Northwestern: 5 by 38.7. Iowa: 1 by 40. Kent State: 1 by 86.7. Toledo: 5 by 82.7. Central Michigan: 1 by 40. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses24.9 · Games = 7
First Half20.5 · Games = 4 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half28.3 · Games = 4 · +7.8 vs First Half
All Games24.4 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/27 | @ Northern Illinois | L 14-33 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Central Michigan | L 22-27 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Toledo | L 20-47 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Kent State | L 14-32 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Iowa | L 3-59 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Northwestern | L 17-38 | — | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Michigan State | L 13-26 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Western Michigan
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 98 | 79.3 | 6.3 | 98 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 31 | 35.9 | 6.2 | -67 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 35 | 37.5 | 5.7 | 4 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 195 | 65.2 | 14.6 | 160 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37
Primary metric
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
23
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan
195 primary output · 65.2 efficiency · 14.6 usage
60.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Western Michigan
50.9
98 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 6.3 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Western Michigan
30.1
35 primary · 37.5 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Portage · Portage, IN
- Committed To
- Western Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
359
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.