Player Stats

Brian Fields College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,970
Rushing yards
1,568
Receiving yards
402
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan00000-
2010 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan1141336251436.5
2011 PostseasonWestern Michigan1114212047.6
2011 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan1137027199247.6
2012 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan9477359118357.5
2013 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan11696574122668.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 696 primary output with 38.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 38.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nicholls

Loss with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Western Michigan

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

63.3

Efficiency

38.3

Usage

30

Consistency

49.4

Best Game by takeover score

Nicholls

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 24. Nicholls: 147. Northwestern: 79. Iowa: 115. Kent State: 106. Toledo: 10. Buffalo: 22. Massachusetts: 82. Eastern Michigan: 45. Central Michigan: 44. Northern Illinois: 22

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 12 by 20.8. Nicholls: 23 by 60.5. Northwestern: 13 by 63.3. Iowa: 20 by 48.1. Kent State: 19 by 58.1. Toledo: 8 by 13. Buffalo: 8 by 27.5. Massachusetts: 20 by 39.7. Eastern Michigan: 18 by 27. Central Michigan: 15 by 30.6. Northern Illinois: 7 by 32.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins82 · Games = 1 · +20.6 vs Losses
Losses61.4 · Games = 10 · -20.6 vs Wins