Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2009-2013North Texas
TE • 6'2" • Henderson, TX, USA
Daniel Prior reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.9
Efficiency
33.3
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
17.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Prior, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · North Texas. Daniel Prior reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Daniel Prior played TE for North Texas. Across 5 tracked seasons, Daniel Prior recorded 16 rushing yards and 34 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
North Texas paired 6 primary output with 40 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
1.3
Efficiency
33.3
Usage
5.9
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 0. Ball State: 0. UTSA: 0. Tulsa: 5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
33.3 vs Tulsa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | North Texas | 6 | 40 | 6.3 | 6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | North Texas | 23 | 33.3 | 4.6 | 17 |
| 2012 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | -23 |
| 2013 Regular Season | North Texas | 5 | 33.3 | 5.9 | 5 |
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18
Primary metric
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
5
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
2
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · North Texas
6 primary output · 40 efficiency · 6.3 usage
42.8
#2
2011 Regular Season · North Texas
38.7
23 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 4.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · North Texas
17.1
5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7889
Henderson · Henderson, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
34
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.