Player Stats

Shawn Southward College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,637
Rushing yards
2,721
Receiving yards
916
Touchdowns
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonTroy13572829249.2
2009 Regular SeasonTroy13668574941049.2
2010 PostseasonTroy1375750060.9
2010 Regular SeasonTroy13738548190960.9
2011 Regular SeasonTroy11725484241458
2012 Regular SeasonTroy121,3741,0123621078.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Troy paired 1,374 primary output with 55.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Troy

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

114.5

Efficiency

55.8

Usage

30.5

Consistency

71.5

Best Game by takeover score

UAB

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAB: 214. Louisiana: 88. Mississippi State: 167. North Texas: 96. South Alabama: 99. Western Kentucky: 57. Florida International: 91. Florida Atlantic: 112. Tennessee: 102. Navy: 81. Arkansas State: 97. Middle Tennessee: 170

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 31 by 74.3. Louisiana: 24 by 28.2. Mississippi State: 25 by 70.6. North Texas: 18 by 47.2. South Alabama: 20 by 52.2. Western Kentucky: 19 by 31.3. Florida International: 14 by 53.6. Florida Atlantic: 13 by 74.5. Tennessee: 18 by 63.1. Navy: 15 by 49.6. Arkansas State: 19 by 45.8. Middle Tennessee: 21 by 79

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins116.2 · Games = 5 · +2.9 vs Losses
Losses113.3 · Games = 7 · -2.9 vs Wins