Player Stats

Travis Van Leeuwen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,189
Receptions
95
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonUtah State0-00-
2010 Regular SeasonUtah State716171055
2011 PostseasonUtah State8126054.1
2011 Regular SeasonUtah State814188254.1
2012 Regular SeasonUtah State712143145
2013 PostseasonUtah State13223073.4
2013 Regular SeasonUtah State1350638373.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Utah State paired 661 primary output with 71.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 71.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UNLV

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Utah State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

50.8

Efficiency

71.3

Usage

18.6

Consistency

60.6

Best Game by takeover score

UNLV

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 23. Utah: 107. Air Force: 70. Weber State: 49. USC: 31. San José State: 30. BYU: 21. Boise State: 25. New Mexico: 18. Hawai'i: 78. UNLV: 112. Wyoming: 45. Fresno State: 52

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 2 by 76.7. Utah: 5 by 100. Air Force: 6 by 77.8. Weber State: 2 by 100. USC: 4 by 51.7. San José State: 4 by 50. BYU: 3 by 46.7. Boise State: 3 by 55.6. New Mexico: 2 by 60. Hawai'i: 5 by 100. UNLV: 4 by 100. Wyoming: 6 by 50. Fresno State: 6 by 57.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.1 · Games = 8 · +5.9 vs Losses
Losses47.2 · Games = 5 · -5.9 vs Wins