Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2022-2025Bucknell
WR • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Nate Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Bucknell
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Anderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Bucknell. Nate Anderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Bucknell paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Michigan, Bucknell.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
— vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | @ Air Force | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Michigan
2022-2023
Opening stop
Bucknell
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 44 | 38.3 | 23.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | — | — | -44 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Bucknell | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
61
Primary metric
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 43.3 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
0
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Bucknell
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Regular Season · Western Michigan
44.9
44 primary · 38.3 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8237
Homestead · Fort Wayne, IN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
44
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Nate Anderson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit