Player Stats

Rodney Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,540
Receptions
106
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonFlorida State117042.6
2010 PostseasonFlorida State13112059.6
2010 Regular SeasonFlorida State1330436359.6
2011 PostseasonFlorida State13434070.4
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida State1332527470.4
2012 PostseasonFlorida State14341060.8
2012 Regular SeasonFlorida State1435483360.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason

Florida State paired 561 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Florida State

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

37.4

Efficiency

69.6

Usage

13.5

Consistency

35.3

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 41. Murray State: 4. Savannah St: 77. Wake Forest: 20. Clemson: 48. South Florida: 19. NC State: 36. Boston College: 108. Miami: 11. Duke: 112. Virginia Tech: 23. Maryland: 6. Florida: 7. Georgia Tech: 12

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 3 by 91.1. Murray State: 2 by 13.3. Savannah St: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 42.2. NC State: 2 by 100. Boston College: 9 by 80. Miami: 1 by 73.3. Duke: 3 by 100. Virginia Tech: 5 by 30.7. Maryland: 1 by 40. Florida: 2 by 23.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins40.1 · Games = 12 · +18.6 vs Losses
Losses21.5 · Games = 2 · -18.6 vs Wins