Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2009-2012Florida State
Rodney Smith
WR • 6'6" • Miami, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Rodney Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
35.3
Season Value
54.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Florida State
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rodney Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Florida State. Rodney Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Florida State paired 561 primary output with 80.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Florida State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
37.4
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
13.5
Consistency
35.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 41. Unknown: 4. Unknown: 77. Wake Forest: 20. Clemson: 48. South Florida: 19. NC State: 36. Boston College: 108. Miami: 11. Duke: 112. Virginia Tech: 23. Maryland: 6. Florida: 7. Georgia Tech: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 3 by 91.1. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Clemson: 2 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 42.2. NC State: 2 by 100. Boston College: 9 by 80. Miami: 1 by 73.3. Duke: 3 by 100. Virginia Tech: 5 by 30.7. Maryland: 1 by 40. Florida: 2 by 23.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins40 · n=10 · +18.5 vs Losses
Losses21.5 · n=2 · -18.5 vs Wins
First Half35 · n=7 · -4.9 vs Second Half
Second Half39.9 · n=7 · +4.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/2 | vs Northern Illinois | W 31-10 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Georgia Tech | W 21-15 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Florida | L 26-37 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Maryland | W 41-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 28-22 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Duke100 receiving yards | W 48-7 | — | 3 | 112 | 37.3 | 37.30 | 0 | 52 |
| Sun 10/21 | @ Miami | W 33-20 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-7 | — | 9 | 108 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ NC State | L 16-17 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ South Florida | W 30-17 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Clemson | W 49-37 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Wake Forest | W 52-0 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida State | 7 | 46.7 | 6.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Florida State | 448 | 71.8 | 13.6 | 441 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Florida State | 448 | 71.8 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Florida State | 561 | 80.3 | 15.4 | 113 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Florida State | 561 | 80.3 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Florida State | 524 | 69.6 | 13.5 | -37 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Florida State | 524 | 69.6 | 13.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Clemson
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Florida
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Florida State
561 primary output · 80.3 efficiency · 15.4 usage
61.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Florida State
61.4
561 primary · 80.3 efficiency · 15.4 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Florida State
54.2
524 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9248
Archbishop Carroll · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Florida State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,540
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.