Usage Score
23.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Florida State
Chris Thompson
RB • 5'8" • Greenville, FL, USA
Explosive all-purpose backBig-play efficiency
Chris Thompson leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 74.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
74.6
Consistency
67.9
Season Value
66.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Florida State
090910101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Thompson, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Florida State. Chris Thompson leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 74.6 efficiency.
Chris Thompson played RB for Florida State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Thompson recorded 1,736 rushing yards, 430 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Florida State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Florida State paired 935 primary output with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 74.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with 220 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Florida State
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
116.9
Efficiency
74.6
Usage
23.8
Consistency
67.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 32. Unknown: 44. Wake Forest: 220. Clemson: 182. South Florida: 98. NC State: 170. Boston College: 95. Miami: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 55.6. Unknown: 4 by 95.8. Wake Forest: 11 by 100. Clemson: 23 by 75.9. South Florida: 18 by 51.6. NC State: 27 by 61.5. Boston College: 14 by 70.8. Miami: 9 by 85.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins137.8 · Games = 5
First Half119.5 · Games = 4 · +5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half114.3 · Games = 4 · -5.3 vs First Half
All Games116.9 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 10/21 | @ Miami | W 33-20 | 7 | 47 | 6.70 | 0 | 2 | 47 | 10.4 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Boston College | W 51-7 | 10 | 68 | 6.80 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 6.8 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ NC State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 16-17 | 25 | 141 | 5.60 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ South Florida | W 30-17 | 16 | 74 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 5.4 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Clemson100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 49-37 | 15 | 103 | 6.90 | 2 | 8 | 79 | 7.9 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Wake Forest100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-0 | 9 | 197 | 21.90 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 20 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 25 | 8.30 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 11 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 32 | 5.30 | 0 | — | — | 5.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Florida State | 130 | 42 | 4.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida State | 130 | 42 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Florida State | 1,001 | 61.3 | 20.4 | 871 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Florida State | 1,001 | 61.3 | 20.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Florida State | 100 | 30.6 | 13.7 | -901 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Florida State | 935 | 74.6 | 23.8 | 835 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Win with 158 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
158
Primary metric
158 scrimmage yards and 26.4 usage.
#2
Wake Forest
220
Primary metric
Win with 220 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
220 scrimmage yards and 17.2 usage.
#3
South Carolina
164
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
164 scrimmage yards and 48.2 usage.
#4
Georgia Tech
49
Primary metric
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#5
Clemson
182
Primary metric
Win with 182 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
182 scrimmage yards and 35.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Florida State
935 primary output · 74.6 efficiency · 23.8 usage
66.4
#2
2010 Postseason · Florida State
57.7
1,001 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 20.4 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Florida State
57.7
1,001 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 20.4 usage
Milestones
7
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.895
Madison County · Greenville, FL
- Committed To
- Florida State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,166
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.