Player Stats

Sean FitzSimmons College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
61
TFL
8.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1211--057.6
2023 Regular SeasonPittsburgh22-0--036.7
2024 PostseasonPittsburgh8210.5--059.1
2024 Regular SeasonPittsburgh8303.513-059.1
2025 PostseasonPittsburgh8510--027.1
2025 Regular SeasonPittsburgh82021--027.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 9 primary output with 27.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 18 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Pittsburgh

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

18

Usage

4

Consistency

12.5

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Carolina: 1. Duquesne: 0. Central Michigan: 0. West Virginia: 2. Louisville: 1. Boston College: 0. Florida State: 0. Stanford: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Carolina: 5 by 30.8. Duquesne: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 4 by 16.7. West Virginia: 6 by 45. Louisville: 3 by 22.5. Boston College: 3 by 12.5. Florida State: 2 by 8.3. Stanford: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 5 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · +1.3 vs Wins