Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2009-2011Middle Tennessee
WR • 6'2" • Atlanta, GA, USA
Richard Drake reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
59.3
Consistency
66
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Richard Drake, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Richard Drake reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 75 primary output with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
15
Efficiency
59.3
Usage
9.4
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 5. Minnesota: 21. Georgia Tech: 29. Arkansas State: 15. Western Kentucky: 5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 16.7. Minnesota: 1 by 100. Georgia Tech: 2 by 96.7. Arkansas State: 2 by 50. Western Kentucky: 1 by 33.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 75 | 59.3 | 9.4 | 75 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 75 | 59.3 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | -75 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29
Primary metric
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas State
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
5
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 16.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
75 primary output · 59.3 efficiency · 9.4 usage
58.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
58.7
75 primary · 59.3 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8333
Stephenson · Stone Mountain, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
75
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Richard Drake quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit