Player Stats

Tavarres Jefferson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,250
Receptions
120
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee311104139.3
2010 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee719247255.2
2011 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee1145343156.7
2012 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee1424048.5
2013 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee1041532578.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Middle Tennessee paired 532 primary output with 81.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 81.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

53.2

Efficiency

81.9

Usage

21.6

Consistency

58.9

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Carolina: 34. North Carolina: 101. Memphis: 78. Florida Atlantic: 66. East Carolina: 41. Marshall: 91. UAB: 5. Florida International: 44. Southern Miss: 36. UTEP: 36

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Carolina: 3 by 75.6. North Carolina: 7 by 96.2. Memphis: 7 by 74.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 88. East Carolina: 3 by 91.1. Marshall: 7 by 86.7. UAB: 1 by 33.3. Florida International: 4 by 73.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.8 · Games = 8 · -22.3 vs Losses
Losses71 · Games = 2 · +22.3 vs Wins