Usage / Role
4%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2009-2013USC
De'Von Flournoy
WR • 6'0" • Studio City, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
De'Von Flournoy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
22
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
35
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · USC
0910111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 5
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
4★
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
De'Von Flournoy, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · USC. De'Von Flournoy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 156
- Receptions
- 10
Quick Answers
De'Von Flournoy quick answers
- Latest team and position
- USC · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 156
- Tracked sample
- 5 unique seasons · 5 entries · 6 games
- Best season
- 2013 Regular Season · USC
- Top game
- California
- Recruit profile
- 4-star · Birmingham · USC
- High school pipeline
- Birmingham · 14 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 1 · Class 2013
- 2013 Receiving yards rank
- 135 receiving yards · WR 527th (top 57%) · Pac-12 82nd (top 45%) · National 739th (top 40%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | USC | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | USC | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Regular Season | USC | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 57.5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 5 | 9 | 135 | 0 | 61.1 |
Related Context
Keep exploring De'Von Flournoy
De'Von Flournoy played WR for USC. Across 5 tracked seasons, De'Von Flournoy recorded 156 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with USC.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
USC paired 135 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · USC
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
27
Efficiency
61.3
Usage
9.6
Consistency
51
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 22. Notre Dame: 2. Utah: 45. California: 63. Stanford: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 2 by 73.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 13.3. Utah: 2 by 100. California: 3 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 20
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins33.3 · Games = 4 · +31.3 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 1 · -31.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20092010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 21 | 100 | 4.3 | 21 |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 135 | 61.3 | 9.6 | 114 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ California
Week 11 · W 62-28 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Receiving Yards
86.2 takeover
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Colorado
Week 8 · W 50-6 · Conference game
21
Receiving Yards
71.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Utah
Week 9 · W 19-3 · Conference game
45
Receiving Yards
67.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Boston College
Week 3 · W 35-7
22
Receiving Yards
49.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
vs Stanford
Week 12 · W 20-17 · Conference game
3
Receiving Yards
12.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · USC
135 primary output · 61.3 efficiency · 9.6 usage
61.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · USC
57.5
21 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · USC
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring De'Von Flournoy
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.