Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2009-2012Northwestern
WR • 5'11" • Freeland, MI, USA
Drew Moulton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
94.7
Season Value
66.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Northwestern
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Moulton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Northwestern. Drew Moulton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Drew Moulton played WR for Northwestern. Across 4 tracked seasons, Drew Moulton recorded 40 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Northwestern.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Northwestern paired 40 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
10
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
5.2
Consistency
94.7
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 11. Unknown: 12. Army: 8. Iowa: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 1 by 73.3. Unknown: 1 by 80. Army: 1 by 53.3. Iowa: 1 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
80 vs Unknown
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northwestern
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Northwestern | 40 | 66.7 | 5.2 | 40 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Northwestern | 40 | 66.7 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | -40 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12
Primary metric
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Army
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Northwestern
40 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
66.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Northwestern
66.6
40 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Northwestern
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8322
Midland · Midland, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
40
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.