Player Dossier

2009-2012

Auburn

Onterio McCalebb

RB • 5'11" • Fort Meade, FL, USA

Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover

Onterio McCalebb leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.3 efficiency.

Usage Score

19

Efficiency

57.3

Consistency

43.6

Season Value

50.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Auburn

09091010111112

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Auburn
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Onterio McCalebb, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Auburn. Onterio McCalebb leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.3 efficiency.

Onterio McCalebb played RB for Auburn. Across 4 tracked seasons, Onterio McCalebb recorded 2,586 rushing yards, 620 receiving yards, and 29 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Auburn.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Auburn paired 896 primary output with 79.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 57.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe

Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Auburn

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

58.5

Efficiency

57.3

Usage

19

Consistency

43.6

Best Game by takeover score

Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 88. Mississippi State: 11. UL Monroe: 134. LSU: 26. Arkansas: 40. Ole Miss: 32. Vanderbilt: 41. Texas A&M: 8. New Mexico State: 113. Georgia: 59. Unknown: 142. Alabama: 8

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 14 by 68.9. Mississippi State: 9 by 8.2. UL Monroe: 13 by 92.9. LSU: 13 by 22. Arkansas: 9 by 39.9. Ole Miss: 9 by 39. Vanderbilt: 10 by 47.6. Texas A&M: 1 by 83.3. New Mexico State: 8 by 100. Georgia: 5 by 99.2. Unknown: 17 by 78.1. Alabama: 4 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins123.5 · Games = 2 · +88.7 vs Losses
Losses34.8 · Games = 9 · -88.7 vs Wins
First Half55.2 · Games = 6 · -6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half61.8 · Games = 6 · +6.7 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

UL Monroe

Best efficiency game

100 vs New Mexico State

Result
Sat 11/24@ AlabamaL 0-493-3-101112
Sat 11/17vs Unknown100 rush yards · 2+ TD151046.9022388.4
Sun 11/11vs GeorgiaL 0-382168034311.8
Sat 11/3vs New Mexico State100 rush yards · 2+ TDW 42-7811314.10214.1
Sat 10/27vs Texas A&ML 21-6318808
Sat 10/20@ VanderbiltL 13-178394.900224.1
Sat 10/13@ Ole MissL 20-418313.900113.6
Sat 10/6vs ArkansasL 7-247243.4002164.4
Sat 9/22vs LSUL 10-1211242.201222
Sat 9/15vs UL Monroe100 rush yardsW 31-281112811.6012610.3
Sat 9/8@ Mississippi StateL 10-28840.500171.2
Sat 9/1vs ClemsonL 19-2612826.800266.3

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Auburn

    2009-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2009200920102010201120112012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 PostseasonAuburn62347.916.5
2009 Regular SeasonAuburn62347.916.50
2010 PostseasonAuburn89679.912.1273
2010 Regular SeasonAuburn89679.912.10
2011 PostseasonAuburn98562.720.889
2011 Regular SeasonAuburn98562.720.80
2012 Regular SeasonAuburn70257.319-283

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Virginia

Win with 162 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

162

Primary metric

162 scrimmage yards and 22.2 usage.

#2

UL Monroe

134

Primary metric

Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

134 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.

#3

Unknown

142

Primary metric

Game with 142 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

142 scrimmage yards and 30.4 usage.

#4

LSU

101

Primary metric

Win with 101 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

101 scrimmage yards and 8.2 usage.

#5

Ole Miss

99

Primary metric

Win with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

99 scrimmage yards and 13.8 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2010 Postseason · Auburn

896 primary output · 79.9 efficiency · 12.1 usage

68.3

#2

2010 Regular Season · Auburn

68.3

896 primary · 79.9 efficiency · 12.1 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · Auburn

63.2

985 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 20.8 usage

Milestones

9

100+ rush yards

1

150+ scrimmage yards

5

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2008 · Rating 0.8978

Fort Meade · Fort Meade, FL

Committed To
Auburn
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2008

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

3,206

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.