Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Arizona State paired 1,238 primary output with 47.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona State | 11 | 324 | 280 | 44 | 2 | 37.8 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12 | 1,014 | 787 | 227 | 10 | 69.4 |
| 2011 Postseason | Arizona State | 13 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 0 | 78 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona State | 13 | 1,230 | 1,038 | 192 | 18 | 78 |
| 2012 Postseason | Arizona State | 13 | 78 | 59 | 19 | 2 | 55.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona State | 13 | 604 | 524 | 80 | 8 | 55.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Arizona State paired 1,238 primary output with 47.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with 93 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
52.5
Efficiency
46.3
Usage
16.8
Consistency
73.1
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 78. Northern Arizona: 42. Illinois: 68. Missouri: 15. Utah: 44. California: 69. Colorado: 93. Oregon: 28. UCLA: 62. Oregon State: 42. USC: 45. Washington State: 75. Arizona: 21
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 9 by 82.2. Northern Arizona: 11 by 25.6. Illinois: 14 by 47.3. Missouri: 4 by 39.1. Utah: 10 by 30.8. California: 17 by 42.3. Colorado: 14 by 74.8. Oregon: 7 by 47.9. UCLA: 19 by 33.4. Oregon State: 10 by 43.8. USC: 8 by 62. Washington State: 16 by 48.8. Arizona: 9 by 24.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.