Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2010-2013Arizona State
Chris Coyle
TE • 6'3" • Westlake Village, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Coyle reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
51.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Arizona State
101112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Coyle, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Arizona State. Chris Coyle reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35.3
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
10.6
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 10. Unknown: 48. Wisconsin: 33. Stanford: 45. USC: 87. Notre Dame: 11. Washington: 78. Washington State: 28. Utah: 35. Oregon State: 5. UCLA: 15. Arizona: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 1 by 66.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 73.3. Stanford: 1 by 100. USC: 5 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 36.7. Washington: 5 by 100. Washington State: 3 by 62.2. Utah: 2 by 100. Oregon State: 1 by 33.3. UCLA: 2 by 50. Arizona: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Wins38.6 · n=8 · +16.6 vs Losses
Losses22 · n=3 · -16.6 vs Wins
First Half39 · n=6 · +7.5 vs Second Half
Second Half31.5 · n=6 · -7.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Texas Tech | L 23-37 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Arizona | W 58-21 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 38-33 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Oregon State | W 30-17 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Utah | W 20-19 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/1 | @ Washington State | W 55-21 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Washington | W 53-24 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Notre Dame | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs USC | W 62-41 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Stanford | L 28-42 | — | 1 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 1 | 45 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 32-30 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2010-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona State | 73 | 70 | 4.3 | 73 |
| 2012 Postseason | Arizona State | 696 | 75.1 | 21.1 | 623 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona State | 696 | 75.1 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Arizona State | 423 | 76.3 | 10.6 | -273 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona State | 423 | 76.3 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 87.3 efficiency score.
#2
USC
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
USC
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Arizona State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Postseason · Arizona State
65.6
696 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 21.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Arizona State
65.6
696 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 21.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9249
Central Cabarrus · Concord, NC
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,192
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.