Player Stats

Eddie Lacy College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,740
Rushing yards
2,402
Receiving yards
338
Touchdowns
32

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonAlabama00000-
2010 PostseasonAlabama786860251
2010 Regular SeasonAlabama733832018451
2011 PostseasonAlabama1243430055.9
2011 Regular SeasonAlabama12762631131755.9
2012 PostseasonAlabama1415714017279.9
2012 Regular SeasonAlabama141,3541,1821721779.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Alabama paired 1,511 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 64.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Win with 194 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Alabama

Games

14

Scrimmage Yards / G

107.9

Efficiency

64.4

Usage

28.5

Consistency

73.8

Best Game by takeover score

Missouri

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 157. Michigan: 45. Western Kentucky: 36. Arkansas: 55. Florida Atlantic: 106. Ole Miss: 97. Missouri: 194. Tennessee: 97. Mississippi State: 77. LSU: 102. Texas A&M: 127. Western Carolina: 99. Auburn: 131. Georgia: 188

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 22 by 73.5. Michigan: 10 by 43.1. Western Kentucky: 9 by 41.7. Arkansas: 12 by 47.7. Florida Atlantic: 15 by 73.6. Ole Miss: 22 by 45.3. Missouri: 20 by 90.4. Tennessee: 20 by 49.3. Mississippi State: 14 by 39.2. LSU: 12 by 82.6. Texas A&M: 20 by 62.4. Western Carolina: 10 by 91.3. Auburn: 18 by 75.8. Georgia: 22 by 85.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins106.5 · Games = 13 · -20.5 vs Losses
Losses127 · Games = 1 · +20.5 vs Wins