Usage Score
28.5
Player Dossier
2009-2012Alabama
Eddie Lacy
RB • 6'0" • Geismar, LA, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Eddie Lacy leans workhorse runner traits and 64.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
64.4
Consistency
73.8
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Alabama
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eddie Lacy, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Alabama. Eddie Lacy leans workhorse runner traits and 64.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Alabama paired 1,511 primary output with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 64.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Win with 194 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Alabama
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
107.9
Efficiency
64.4
Usage
28.5
Consistency
73.8
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 157. Michigan: 45. Western Kentucky: 36. Arkansas: 55. Florida Atlantic: 106. Ole Miss: 97. Missouri: 194. Tennessee: 97. Mississippi State: 77. LSU: 102. Texas A&M: 127. Unknown: 99. Auburn: 131. Georgia: 188
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 22 by 73.5. Michigan: 10 by 43.1. Western Kentucky: 9 by 41.7. Arkansas: 12 by 47.7. Florida Atlantic: 15 by 73.6. Ole Miss: 22 by 45.3. Missouri: 20 by 90.4. Tennessee: 20 by 49.3. Mississippi State: 14 by 39.2. LSU: 12 by 82.6. Texas A&M: 20 by 62.4. Unknown: 10 by 91.3. Auburn: 18 by 75.8. Georgia: 22 by 85.6
Split Comparison
Wins107.1 · n=12
First Half98.6 · n=7 · -18.7 vs Second Half
Second Half117.3 · n=7 · +18.7 vs First Half
All Games107.9 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
91.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/8 | vs Notre Dame100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-14 | 20 | 140 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 7.1 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Georgia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 32-28 | 20 | 181 | 9.10 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8.5 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Auburn100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-0 | 18 | 131 | 7.30 | 2 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | 10 | 99 | 9.90 | 3 | — | — | 9.9 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Texas A&M | L 24-29 | 16 | 92 | 5.80 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 6.3 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ LSU | W 21-17 | 11 | 83 | 7.50 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 8.5 |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 38-7 | 10 | 26 | 2.60 | 0 | 4 | 51 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Tennessee | W 44-13 | 17 | 79 | 4.60 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Missouri100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-10 | 18 | 177 | 9.80 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 9.7 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Ole Miss | W 33-14 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Florida Atlantic100 rush yards | W 40-7 | 15 | 106 | 7.10 | 0 | — | — | 7.1 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 52-0 | 12 | 55 | 4.60 | 3 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 35-0 | 9 | 36 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Michigan | W 41-14 | 9 | 35 | 3.90 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Alabama | 424 | 66.3 | 14.8 | 424 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 424 | 66.3 | 14.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Alabama | 805 | 64.5 | 15.9 | 381 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 805 | 64.5 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Alabama | 1,511 | 64.4 | 28.5 | 706 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 1,511 | 64.4 | 28.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Missouri
Win with 194 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
194
Primary metric
194 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#2
North Texas
161
Primary metric
Win with 161 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
161 scrimmage yards and 17 usage.
#3
Georgia
188
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
188 scrimmage yards and 34.4 usage.
#4
San José State
114
Primary metric
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114 scrimmage yards and 23 usage.
#5
Kent State
134
Primary metric
Win with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Alabama
1,511 primary output · 64.4 efficiency · 28.5 usage
66.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Alabama
66.7
1,511 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 28.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Alabama
49.8
805 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
10
100+ rush yards
4
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.94
Dutchtown · Geismar, LA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,740
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.