Player Stats

Zach Mettenberger College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,470
Passing yards
5,783
Touchdowns
35

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonLSU21209228139.2
2012 PostseasonLSU1379120-41159.1
2012 Regular SeasonLSU132,3222,489-1671159.1
2013 Regular SeasonLSU122,9493,082-1332266.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

LSU paired 2,949 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 64.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Furman

Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · LSU

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

245.8

Efficiency

64.5

Usage

9.3

Consistency

82.2

Best Game by takeover score

Furman

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. TCU: 240. UAB: 299. Kent State: 264. Auburn: 222. Georgia: 346. Mississippi State: 319. Florida: 153. Ole Miss: 244. Furman: 328. Alabama: 212. Texas A&M: 193. Arkansas: 129

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 35 by 53.8. UAB: 22 by 85.2. Kent State: 18 by 90.7. Auburn: 26 by 58. Georgia: 41 by 61.5. Mississippi State: 32 by 67.5. Florida: 19 by 58.1. Ole Miss: 36 by 47.6. Furman: 24 by 77.8. Alabama: 29 by 64.2. Texas A&M: 22 by 58.9. Arkansas: 26 by 51.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins238.6 · Games = 9 · -28.8 vs Losses
Losses267.3 · Games = 3 · +28.8 vs Wins